Removing the Human from the Equation
Photo by Possessed Photography on Unsplash
If the core problem in behavioural finance is that human emotion corrupts rational investment decisions at precisely the wrong moments, one powerful solution is to remove as many decisions as possible from the process. Automation does not make better decisions than a thoughtful investor in a calm state — but it makes consistently adequate decisions, free from the distortions of fear, greed, and cognitive bias, in every state including the bad ones.
Automated Monthly Contributions
Photo by Christin Hume on Unsplash
Dollar-cost averaging — investing a fixed amount at fixed intervals regardless of market conditions — removes the decision of "when to invest." Rather than waiting for a "good time" to invest (which recency bias will ensure is always when prices are high), an investor who contributes automatically each month buys at all price levels, including the low ones that feel terrifying but are mathematically attractive. The evidence on market timing is unambiguous: missing the best 10 days in any decade's equity market returns typically cuts total returns in half. Automated contributions make it impossible to miss those days by sitting on the sidelines.
Automatic Rebalancing
Photo by Campaign Creators on Unsplash
Rebalancing is one of the most behaviourally difficult things an investor must do: selling what has recently performed well and buying more of what has recently underperformed. This is precisely contrary to every emotional instinct and to recency bias. Trigger-based or calendar-based automatic rebalancing removes the decision from the investor entirely. The portfolio is rebalanced to its target allocation not because the investor decided to act, but because a rule was set in advance and the system followed it.
Default Opt-In: The Nudge Architecture
Photo by Emiliano Vittoriosi on Unsplash
Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein's concept of "nudge" architecture recognises that inertia is a powerful force — and that it can be redirected. Pension schemes that auto-enrol participants at a sensible default contribution rate and default asset allocation exploit inertia constructively: employees who would never have actively enrolled do not actively opt out either, and end up saving. The UK's auto-enrolment pension legislation, informed directly by this research, dramatically increased the proportion of workers saving for retirement.
Save More Tomorrow
Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on Unsplash
Thaler and Shlomo Benartzi's "Save More Tomorrow" programme (SMarT, 2004) demonstrated the power of combining automation with future commitment. Workers were invited to commit in advance to directing a portion of future pay rises toward their pension. Because the increase came from new money — not a cut in take-home pay — the loss aversion that prevents people from increasing current savings did not apply. Participation rates in workplace pension schemes increased dramatically in the companies that trialled the programme, without requiring any active decision at the point of contribution.
Target-Date Funds
Photo by Maxim Hopman on Unsplash
Target-date funds automate the entire investment allocation and glide path: equities-heavy when the investor is young, shifting progressively toward bonds as the target date approaches. One fund handles all allocation decisions over decades without requiring any ongoing choices. For most investors, removing allocation decisions removes the opportunity to make allocation mistakes.